Shea R.I.S.E Dashboard

—

— —

Season Comparison · FN → Dried Kernels

2025 / 26

🌰 Fresh Nuts

—

⚗ Dried Kernels

—

2023 / 24

🌰 Fresh Nuts

—

⚗ Dried Kernels

—

Fresh Nuts Growth — 2025/26 vs 2023/24

—

Year on year

Network Position (KG)

Fresh Nuts 2025/26 vs Network Max (163,455 kg)—

Dried KG vs Network Max (53,125 kg)—

Tags

Processing Communities

Bottleneck

⚠

Ops Team Note

—

Infrastructure (Per Centre)

Workforce

Women Impacted

—

using this centre

Women Collectors

—

supplying FN

Processors / Day

—

at centre

Post-Harvest Centre Setup

Centre Setup Cost

—

Cost of setting up this centre

2025/26 Volume Detail

FN (Fresh Nuts)

—

Dried Nuts (Kernel)

—

Cooperative Profile

Founded

—

SFC Partner Since

—

Secretary

—

Magazia

—

Total Members

—

Capacity

—

Operational Insights

Cooperative Highlight

Field Story

—

Expansion

—

Investment Case — Per Centre

Investment

$50K

per centre (incl. tricycles)

Women Benefitting

240

collectors + processors

Income Impact — Women in Programme

Seasonal Income

+120%

GHS 4,500 → GHS 9,882

Nuts Collected

+400%

20 kg → 100 kg / day

Daily Income vs Minimum Wage

11.8×

GHS 235/day vs GHS 20 minimum · generated from pilot

Ghana Programme — 3-Year Rollout

Total Centres

Yr 1: 30 · Yr 2: 40 · Yr 3: 10

Women at Scale

19,200

collectors + processors

Total Income Generated / Year

$9.4M

$7.9M collectors · $1.3M processors · $100K drivers + bookkeepers

Total Programme Investment — Ghana

CAPEX (Centres)

$4.0M

equipment · tricycles · infrastructure

Capacity Building

$1.9M

training · cooperative support

Total Ghana Ask

$5.92M

over 3 years · 80 centres · 19,200 women

Shea R.I.S.E Dashboard

SFC Shea · Northern Ghana · 2023–24 vs 2025–26 · KG Focus

964 t

Fresh Nuts 2025–26

11,342 bags × 85 kg

→ Dried Kernels: 323 t 3,802 bags

492 t

Fresh Nuts 2023–24

5,784 bags × 85 kg

→ Dried Kernels: 164 t 1,928 bags

+96%

YoY FN Growth

492 t → 964 t Fresh Nuts

—

Women Impacted

Collectors + processors across centres

16,184

Coop Members

Total across 10 cooperatives

FN Volume by Cooperative — 2023/24 vs 2025/26 (kg)

Fresh Nuts purchased · 1 bag = 85 kg · Green = 2025/26 · Indigo = 2023/24

Performance Distribution

20 operational centres

Centre Status — 2025/26

FN kg · Status · Key bottleneck

Assess

Baseline vs Endline · Social · Health · Economic · Environmental · SGG/SFC Ghana Data

Load Centre Data

Season

Centre

🌰 Dried Nuts (Kernels)

Total Dried Kernels

tonnes

1 bag FN ≈ 85 kg · ~3 kg FN → 1 kg dried kernel

🧈 Butter

Total Raw Butter

tonnes

Gate-to-gate: kernels received → finished butter

📋 Methodology Note

All impact projections generated by this tool are quantitative estimations derived from the Nitidae SGG/SFC Ghana Project baseline-vs-endline comparative analysis. Conversion rates and improvement coefficients represent population-level averages calculated across assessed cooperative cohorts operating under SFC's collective mechanised processing model.

Observed Ranges — Centres in SHEE Transition

Firewood intensity (nuts)−43% to −66%

GHG emissions (nuts)−43% to −66%

Revenue premium (nuts)+59% (GHS 4.71 → 7.50/kg)

Firewood intensity (butter)~−35%

Water consumption (butter)~−20%

Ranges reflect observed best-case and worst-case variance across cooperative centres currently transitioning to the SHEE Scorecard framework. The SHEE Scorecard (Scorecard tab) constitutes the primary annual performance assessment instrument for individual centre evaluation. Projections should be interpreted as indicative estimates and reviewed against site-specific field data where available.

SHEE Scorecard Report — Shea R.I.S.E Dashboard, Northern Ghana

Social · Health · Economic · Environmental · Baseline vs Endline (SGG/SFC Project Data)

⚡

Enter a quantity on the left to calculate the environmental and economic impact

SHEE Cooperative Scorecard

Social · Health · Economic · Environmental — SGG/SFC Ghana

SHEE Cooperative Calculator & Scorecard

This tool calculates SHEE performance scores for shea cooperatives. It is an internal assessment tool only — not a certification system. Scores are used for internal monitoring, buyer-facing summaries, and season-on-season improvement tracking.

Three Scorecard Types

A. Nut — Individual Processing · B. Nut — Collective Processing · C. Butter — Collective Processing
Select your type on the Co-op Info tab. Functional unit: Nuts = per 1 kg dried kernels · Butter = per 1 kg raw butter.

Four Pillars

Social (S) · Health (H) · Economic (E) · Environmental (En)
Default weights: Social 20% · Health 20% · Economic 25% · Environmental 35%.

Aggregation — Geometric Mean

Pillar scores are combined using a weighted geometric mean — not a simple sum. This means a very low score on one pillar cannot be compensated by high scores elsewhere.

Overall = 100 × (S/100)^wS × (H/100)^wH × (E/100)^wE × (En/100)^wEn

Governance Gate

Four governance criteria (G1–G4) must be assessed. Pass = full premium benefits. Conditional = reduced benefits pending resolution. Fail = cooperative may lose premium benefits or SFC may suspend purchasing.

Grade Bands

A (85–100) Leading · B (70–84) Strong · C (55–69) Moderate · D (40–54) Weak · E (<40) Critical
If any pillar scores below 40, grade is capped at C. Below 25 caps at D.

Default Pillar Weights

20%

Social

20%

Health

25%

Economic

35%

Environmental

Scorecard Type

B · Nut — Collective Processing

A · Nut — Individual Processing

C · Butter — Collective Processing

Cooperative Information

Cooperative Name *

Processing Centre

Country

District / Region

Assessment Date *

Season

Assessor Name *

Number of Members

Notes / Context

Governance Gate — G1 to G4

Four governance criteria must be assessed. Pass all 4 = Full benefits. One Partial + no Fail = Conditional benefits. Any Fail or 2+ Partial = cooperative may lose premium benefits or SFC may suspend purchasing until issues are resolved.

G1 · Democratic Representation & Vote

Women elect leaders by majority vote. Leadership structure and terms are documented.

✓ Pass

~ Partial

✗ Fail

G2 · Grievance & Non-Retaliation Mechanism

A documented grievance process exists. Members can raise concerns without fear of retaliation.

✓ Pass

~ Partial

✗ Fail

G3 · Financial Transparency

Accounts are shared with members. Collective funds usage is transparent and documented.

✓ Pass

~ Partial

✗ Fail

G4 · Traceable Cooperative Records

Member lists, production records, and financial records are maintained and traceable.

✓ Pass

~ Partial

✗ Fail

No results yet — complete the Inputs tab and click Calculate.

Map Legend

—

—

Load Centre Data

🌰 Dried Nuts (Kernels)

🧈 Butter

📋 Methodology Note

Three Scorecard Types

Four Pillars

Aggregation — Geometric Mean

Governance Gate

Grade Bands